Trump administration charges former FBI Director James Comey for the third time
The Trump administration is attempting to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey for what it calls disclosing classified information, employing the unusual maneuver of bypassing a grand jury.
This page is Both News's AI analysis of the article, not the article itself. Read the full story on the publisher's site.
Read the original articlePBS NewsHour · pbs.orgRead Just the Facts8 outlets, left to rightOur verdict
Political lean
0 = center. The further from 0, the stronger the lean (max 10).
Reporting balance
How complete and even-handed the reporting is — separate from which side it leans.
This is a fairly neutral, brief AP report: the Justice Department's allegations and Comey's lawyers' challenge are both attributed, and the headline matches the body. Its main weakness is thin context and missing voices, with no response from Comey, no DOJ explanation of the grand-jury bypass, and no background on the earlier cases. Readers should treat it as an early, developing account and seek fuller coverage before judging the case.
- Why this lean
- The story covers a government prosecution of a Trump critic without taking a left/right position. Both sides' claims are attributed to their sources, and the story states no opinion. The one slightly tilted element is the unattributed 'unusual maneuver' and the 'foe' label, which lean mildly toward casting the case as an unusual move against a critic. These are small enough to keep the score at center.
- Framing
- Told as a legal development: the administration's new charge against a former FBI director, and the defense's claim that it is invalid, with the central question being whether the case can proceed.
Confidence: Medium — The article is a short, developing wire item with no response from the accused, no DOJ explanation, and no legal analysis. The assessment covers only what the text reports and cannot test the legal merits.
Key Findings
- 1Attribution is mostly clear: 'what it calls disclosing classified information' and 'a move Comey's lawyers say makes the case legally invalid' separate the government's and the defense's claims from the reporter's own statements.
- 2The reporter's own evaluation appears unattributed in the lede: 'employing the unusual maneuver of bypassing a grand jury' presents AP's judgment as fact.
- 3The 'longtime critic and foe' label gives useful background on the Trump-Comey relationship, but it is not attributed to any source and sits in the same sentence as the charge.
- 4The story is brief and flagged as developing, with no response from Comey or a DOJ explanation of the grand-jury decision, so the central legal dispute is only one-sided in detail.
- 5The headline accurately reflects the body's count of prosecutions and does not overstate the charges.
Who gets a voice
- U.S. Justice DepartmentBrought the third criminal case; its allegations appear in documents unsealed in federal court in WashingtonGovernment / prosecutionMain voice
- Comey's lawyersArgue the case is legally invalid because the grand jury was bypassedDefense of ComeyMain voice
Loaded language
'Foe' frames Comey as a personal antagonist of the president, a label the article does not attribute to any source.
'Unusual maneuver' is the reporter's own evaluation, presented as fact and not as the lawyers' or a legal expert's view.
Dimension Breakdown
Only two sides are represented: the Justice Department, reached through its unsealed filing, and Comey's lawyers, through a single claim. No independent experts or additional parties are quoted.
Most wording is plain and attributed, but 'the unusual maneuver of bypassing a grand jury' and 'longtime critic and foe of President Donald Trump' are the reporter's own characterizations, presented without attribution.
The story has no statistics. The main factual claims are attributed (the DOJ's allegations, the lawyers' argument), but the article does not say how many of the earlier cases produced outcomes or how often grand juries are bypassed.
The DOJ's position and Comey's lawyers' position are both given, but Comey himself and any DOJ explanation of why it bypassed the grand jury are missing, so the core dispute is only partly presented.
The headline matches the body (charges filed, third case by the DOJ). It leaves out that the charges are the government's allegations and that the grand-jury challenge is still only a defense claim.
The story gives no background on the first two cases, the classified-information allegation, or the legal issue around a grand-jury bypass. It is also marked developing, so a reader cannot judge the case's strength from this text alone.
Missing Perspectives
- Comey or his public response to the new charge, which would show how the accused side describes the allegations.
- The DOJ's explanation of why it bypassed the grand jury, which is the basis of the defense's legal challenge.
- Legal experts on whether a grand-jury bypass is valid, which would let readers judge the lawyers' claim without relying on either side.
- Background on the first two cases and their outcomes, which would show whether this is a pattern and how the courts have ruled so far.
Highlighted Passages
“employing the unusual maneuver of bypassing a grand jury”
“longtime critic and foe of President Donald Trump”
Key Facts
- According to the Justice Department, Comey is being prosecuted for what the department calls disclosing classified information.
- The allegations from the Justice Department were made in documents unsealed Monday in federal court in Washington.
- According to Comey's lawyers, bypassing a grand jury makes the case legally invalid.
- The AP reports this would be the third criminal case the Justice Department has brought against Comey since Trump returned to the White House last year.
- The article describes the story as developing and says it will be updated when more details become available.
