Both.news
Story AnalysisNews report

Josh Shapiro signals support for abolishing Electoral College

Gov. Josh Shapiro (D-PA) is a centrist Democrat who will have to work alongside socialist peers once the new Congress convenes in January.

washingtonexaminer.comPublished Analyzed on November 8, 2026

This page is Both News's AI analysis of the article, not the article itself. Read the full story on the publisher's site.

Our verdict

Political lean

Center
◀ Left 10Center10 Right ▶

0 = center. The further from 0, the stronger the lean (max 10).

Reporting balance

39
One-sided
39 / 100

How complete and even-handed the reporting is — separate from which side it leans.

This is a very short, largely neutral news item reporting that Josh Shapiro expressed openness to abolishing the Electoral College. Its main weakness is incompleteness: no quotes, no opposing views, and no constitutional context in the visible text. Readers should treat the headline's signals support as slightly stronger than the body proves and seek Shapiro's full remarks and counter-arguments elsewhere.

Why this lean
Visible body neutrally reports Shapiro's position without partisan adjectives or one-sided sourcing favoring a party, keeping it in the center range; the +1 reflects slight right-leaning framing choices: headline upgrades expressed openness to signals support and body frames the proposal as doing away with the constitutional process.
Framing
The story is told from a campaign-news angle treating the central question as whether a newly empowered Democrat will push to eliminate the Electoral College.

Confidence: Low — Visible article body is only two sentences before a subscribe paywall, with no direct quotes, so lean and balance judgments rest on incomplete text.

Key Findings

  1. 1Headline overstates body slightly: headline says signals support while body only documents expressed openness toward the idea.
  2. 2Visible reporting is factually spare but neutral in tone, using expressed openness and was asked rather than speculative verbs like admitted or slammed.
  3. 3No direct quote from Shapiro or Favreau is included in the visible portion, so readers cannot judge tone or exact commitment.
  4. 4Body describes the Electoral College as the constitutional process for electing the president, which legitimizes the institution without explaining the amendment path.
  5. 5Surrounding site packaging links to Spanberger and the Democrats constitutional wrecking crew and Democrats to plot their power grabs for 2028 and tags the story Socialism, but that framing is not in the news sentences themselves.

Who gets a voice

  • Josh Shapiro
    Governor of Pennsylvania, Democrat
    Open to abolishing the Electoral CollegeMain voice
  • Jon Favreau
    Pod Save America host, questioner
    Asking about Democrat-led push to end Electoral CollegeMinor voice

Dimension Breakdown

Source Diversity2/10

Only Shapiro and questioner Jon Favreau are referenced, with no direct quotes and no independent or opposing source in the visible text.

Language Neutrality8/10

Visible sentences use plain attribution like expressed openness and was asked, with no emotive labels for groups in the body.

Data Balance5/10

No numbers, polls, or historical results are presented; the only factual claim about decisive victory is unattributed and lacks vote or seat context.

Perspective Completeness3/10

Only Shapiro's openness is described; defenders of the Electoral College, Republicans, and constitutional scholars are not heard.

Headline Accuracy6/10

Headline signals support claims slightly more commitment than body phrase expressed openness toward the idea supports.

Context Sufficiency3/10

No background on what abolition would require, why the Electoral College exists, or what Shapiro actually said is included in the visible portion.

Missing Perspectives

  • Republican or pro-Electoral College voices are absent, leaving no counter-argument about federalism, small-state representation, or amendment hurdles.
  • Constitutional experts or procedural context are absent, so readers cannot assess how a Democrat-led Congress could or could not abolish the College.
  • Shapiro's full statement and any clarification or campaign context are absent because the text cuts off at the paywall.

Highlighted Passages

“expressed openness toward the idea of abolishing the Electoral College”
Milder than the headline's signals support, showing headline-body gap on strength of commitment.
“leading a charge to do away with the constitutional process for electing the president”
Uses informal do away with and emphasizes constitutional status, slightly heightening stakes without adding context.

Key Facts

  • Gov. Josh Shapiro (D-PA) expressed openness toward abolishing the Electoral College, according to the article
  • The remarks followed the Democratic Party's 2026 midterm elections victory, according to the article
  • Shapiro was speaking at the Crooked Con event in Washington, D.C., according to the article
  • He was asked by Pod Save America host Jon Favreau about a Democrat-led Congress pushing to end the process, according to the article
  • The article was published November 7, 2026 by Carter Schroppe, according to the byline
Read the original articlewashingtonexaminer.com · washingtonexaminer.com

Like reading the news this way?

Get the top stories as fact-based reports and bias analyses, from left, center and right. Free, unsubscribe any time.

Outlets we read and analyze every day

61 outlets from the left, center and right. Logos belong to their publishers; we're not affiliated with them.

Every outlet, with ownership and lean →