Both.news
Donate
Story AnalysisScienceNews report

Historically quiet Atlantic hurricane season shatters century-old record amid brewing Super El Niño

The Atlantic Basin hasn't seen a single hurricane at this point in the season for the first time in 112 years, the last "year without a hurricane." Hostile El Niño-driven winds have suppressed the Atlantic season, with just five named storms and no hurricanes thus far.

FOX WeatherPublished Analyzed on October 1, 2026

This page is Both News's AI analysis of the article, not the article itself. Read the full story on the publisher's site.

Our verdict

Political lean

Center
◀ Left 10Center10 Right ▶

0 = center. The further from 0, the stronger the lean (max 10).

Reporting balance

61
Mostly balanced
61 / 100

How complete and even-handed the reporting is — separate from which side it leans.

The article is a mostly neutral, well-sourced weather report with no left/right lean and accurate headlines, and it includes useful counter-context such as the 40% of remaining season activity. Its main weakness is thin source independence, since nearly every voice belongs to FOX Weather or NOAA, along with a small-sample October claim and a 97% probability presented without explanation. Readers should treat the seasonal outlook as an official-agency forecast and check independent meteorological sources for uncertainty.

Why this lean
The story has no left/right political angle. Its framing is scientific and meteorological, and it sources official agencies and its own specialists with no partisan adjectives or opposing political voices. Stylistic emphasis (dramatic verbs and adjectives such as 'Hostile' and 'dearth') raises the intensity but does not tilt politically.
Framing
The story is told from the perspective of FOX Weather's forecasting team and NOAA, and treats El Niño's suppression of the Atlantic season as the central question, with the remaining risk to Florida as a secondary concern.

Confidence: Medium — The text is complete and clearly an article, but the forecasting and climate claims (the 97% probability, the October historical pattern and the Atlantic suppression mechanism) need specialist knowledge that cannot be verified from the text alone.

Key Findings

  1. 1The article's main claim, that El Niño suppresses Atlantic activity, is attributed to NOAA and supported by a clear ENSO explanation. It is a checkable scientific claim, not an opinion.
  2. 2Inconvenient context is included. The story notes that about 40% of the season's activity remains, that the Central American Gyre can still spawn systems, and that Norcross says 'this week is only the mid-point of the hurricane season for South Florida'. This tempers the headline's sense of a finished quiet season.
  3. 3Sourcing is thin on independence. Nearly every voice is FOX's own specialist, FOX's own forecast center or NOAA. No outside forecaster or academic is quoted, so the story has no independent check on the seasonal outlook.
  4. 4The October finding is presented without its basis. 'No tropical systems formed in the Gulf or Caribbean in October during those years since 1960' does not say how many Super El Niño years there were, which makes the pattern hard to weigh.
  5. 5The 97% probability is attributed to NOAA but not explained. The article does not say what the number measures or how much uncertainty surrounds it, which can make a forecast sound more certain than it is.
  6. 6Vivid wording ('Hostile', 'dearth', 'the script is completely flipped') adds drama to an otherwise measured, attributed report, though it does not distort the facts.

Who gets a voice

  • Bryan Norcross
    FOX Weather hurricane specialist
    Outlet's in-house expert: caution and preparedness, with a note that the season is not overMain voice
  • FOX Forecast Center
    Outlet's forecasting team (unnamed analysts)
    Outlet's own historical analysis of storm records and October patternsMain voice
  • NOAA
    Federal weather and climate agency (cited, not quoted)
    Official forecast: El Niño as main driver and 97% chance of Super El NiñoMain voice
  • CSU/CIRA
    Colorado State University / CIRA (chart credit only)
    Satellite imagery of Hurricane Lowell (credit only)Minor voice

Loaded language

“Hostile El Niño-driven winds”→ Strong upper-level winds linked to El Niño

Treats a physical weather process as an adversary, which adds drama without new information

“dearth of Atlantic tropical activity”→ lack of Atlantic tropical activity

Literary, slightly heavier word choice that intensifies the sense of scarcity

“the script is completely flipped”→ conditions are reversed in the Pacific

Casual idiom that makes the Pacific contrast sound more dramatic than the data shows

“Super El Niño has also historically limited significant source of October tropical activity”→ Super El Niño years have been associated with few October tropical systems since 1960

Garbled subhead that makes a small-sample pattern sound like an established rule

Dimension Breakdown

Source Diversity4/10

Almost every source is institutional or in-house: FOX Forecast Center (unnamed), FOX's own specialist Bryan Norcross, and NOAA. No outside forecasters, academics or other outlets are quoted, and the CSU credit is only on a chart.

Language Neutrality7/10

Most attribution is plain ('according to NOAA', 'Norcross said'). Some vivid wording appears, such as 'Hostile El Niño-driven winds' and 'dearth', as well as the casual 'the script is completely flipped'.

Data Balance8/10

Figures are sourced and given with base rates: 1914 and 1907 as the only years without a hurricane, the satellite-era (1966) comparison, the 112-year gap, and the list of earlier quiet Septembers. Inconvenient data is included (about 40% of the season's activity remains; Norcross notes undetected storms are possible). The Super El Niño October finding lacks a stated number of years.

Perspective Completeness5/10

The main on-the-record voices are the outlet's own specialist and agency sources. No independent expert disputes or qualifies the seasonal outlook, and no Florida or coastal residents or emergency managers are heard, though Norcross is quoted urging preparedness.

Headline Accuracy8/10

The headline and takeaways match the body: no hurricanes yet, the quietest satellite-era start, and El Niño as the main factor. The subhead about October activity claims more than the small-sample evidence supports.

Context Sufficiency7/10

The article explains ENSO, the Super El Niño threshold (2 °C for three months), and the Central American Gyre. It does not explain how reliable early-season suppression is as a predictor, what the 97% probability means in practice, or how many Super El Niño years the October statistic covers.

Missing Perspectives

  • Independent meteorologists or academic climatologists who could assess how reliable early-season suppression is as a predictor, and whether the 97% Super El Niño figure is itself uncertain.
  • The National Hurricane Center or other official forecasting bodies, which would confirm the outlook independently of FOX's own forecast team.
  • Florida or Gulf Coast emergency managers or residents, whose preparedness is what Norcross's caution is aimed at. Their view would show how officials are advising people this season.
  • A clearer caveat that a quiet early season has not reliably predicted quiet late seasons, which a reader would need to judge how much weight the headline should carry.

Highlighted Passages

“Super El Niño has also historically limited significant source of October tropical activity”
The subhead claims an established historical limit, but the body supports only a small-sample observation from a few years since 1960 and gives no count.
“during Super El Niño years, no tropical systems formed in the Gulf or Caribbean in October during those years since 1960, the FOX Forecast Center found”
A striking absolute claim with no sample size, leaving readers unable to judge how strong the pattern is.
“now with a 97% chance of becoming a Super El Niño between October and December 2026, according to NOAA”
The probability is attributed but presented without explaining what it measures or its uncertainty.
“Hostile El Niño-driven winds have suppressed the Atlantic season”
Emotive framing of a natural process; the same point could be stated neutrally.

Key Facts

  • According to the FOX Forecast Center, 1914 and 1907 are the only years without recorded Atlantic hurricanes.
  • The Atlantic is off to its quietest start on record in the satellite era (since 1966), with five named storms and no hurricanes so far, according to the article's reporting.
  • According to NOAA, El Niño is the main driving factor behind the lack of Atlantic tropical activity.
  • According to NOAA, there is a 97% chance of a Super El Niño forming between October and December 2026.
  • According to the FOX Forecast Center, no homegrown tropical systems formed in the Gulf or Caribbean in October during Super El Niño years since 1960.
  • The Pacific has produced 18 named storms, including six hurricanes, four of which reached major hurricane status, as stated in the article.
  • According to Bryan Norcross, hurricanes could have formed in 1907 and 1914 without being detected because they stayed far from land and ships.
  • Climatologically, about 40% of the season's hurricane activity still remains, according to the article.
Read the original articleFOX Weather · foxweather.com