Both.news
Just the Facts

Federal prosecutors demand California counties set aside suspected noncitizen ballots

Federal prosecutors have asked at least 18 California counties to set aside and verify ballots the Justice Department says may belong to noncitizens, as a lawsuit over roughly 20,000 suspected noncitizen voters heads to a hearing Tuesday.

Both News · AI-written from cited reporting

Written from 5 reports by outlets across the spectrum

Updated:

Federal prosecutors on Friday sent letters to county registrars across California demanding that local officials set aside and verify ballots that the Justice Department says may belong to noncitizens.1

The letters give counties 48 hours to provide identifying information for the ballots in question and ask officials to sequester any ballots where citizenship cannot be verified. According to the Los Angeles county registrar’s office, at least 18 counties across the state have received similar letters. The Los Angeles county registrar and a letter obtained by the Associated Press were the sources for the demands, which represent the latest escalation in a legal battle between California and the Trump administration’s Justice Department.1

The letters follow a lawsuit the federal government filed earlier this month against Los Angeles County and the California secretary of state’s office. In that case, the government seeks to block the counting of votes from roughly 20,000 people it describes as “likely” noncitizen voters. A hearing in the case is scheduled for Tuesday.1

On Thursday, the Justice Department asked the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene in the lawsuit and temporarily block California from counting more than 20,000 mail-in ballots that the Trump administration claims were cast by non-U.S. citizens. The request asked the appeals court to rule on the lawsuit before a decision from the district judge assigned to the case, and it set a deadline of Saturday.1,3

The Guardian described the lawsuit as aiming to block the counting of votes from roughly 20,000 people, while The Hill described more than 20,000 mail-in ballots. The Washington Times headline described the appeal as asking a court to order California to discard ballots from suspected noncitizens.1,3,4

“Any election official who knowingly processes the ballot of a noncitizen is opening themselves to legal jeopardy,” said first assistant US attorney Bill Essayli. The Justice Department is asking counties for information about the voters it suspects are noncitizens, including Social Security numbers, identification information and a copy of their registration.1

A letter sent to San Bernardino County voting officials said the government’s list of suspected noncitizen voters includes 1,133 people from the inland Southern California county. The letter said the information would help the government and the state quickly assess each person suspected of illegally registering to vote.1

California’s secretary of state and the Los Angeles county registrar have opposed the federal government’s demands. In legal filings, lawyers for California argue that the request threatens to delay the certification of the vote and could undermine the legitimacy of the November midterm elections. They also contend that the federal government’s data is unreliable and that the demands risk disenfranchising citizens.1

Voting is under way in California, where more than 23 million registered voters began receiving ballots in the mail earlier this month. The state said in legal filings that more than 330,000 mail-in ballots have already been counted.1

The letters arrived on the heels of a statewide sweep by federal authorities earlier in the week. In that sweep, 28 people from the list of 20,000 were charged with illegally registering to vote. Some were also charged with illegally voting and with lying on naturalization paperwork, and those charges could lead to years in prison.1

The Daily Signal reported in an exclusive that an election integrity group is seeking records on what California has done with the Justice Department’s list of 20,000 potential noncitizens.5

The counties were given 48 hours to respond to the federal letters, and the government asked the appeals court to act by Saturday.1,3

The district court hearing in the lawsuit is set for Tuesday, while the appeals court request sought a ruling by Saturday.1,3

Like reading the news this way?

Get the top stories as fact-based reports and bias analyses, from left, center and right. Free, unsubscribe any time.

How each side told it

Left

The Guardian led with the letters to county registrars and their demand that officials set aside and verify ballots, gave prominence to California’s arguments that the federal data is unreliable and that the demands risk disenfranchising citizens, and added that illegal voting by noncitizens is incredibly rare, difficult to prove and has not been shown to change the outcome of races.

Center

The Hill led with the Justice Department’s appeal to the Ninth Circuit, treated the story as a court filing, and described the ballots as more than 20,000 mail-in ballots that the Trump administration claims were cast by non-U.S. citizens.

Right

The New York Post headline framed the story around the Trump administration raising the stakes in a “bombshell” lawsuit over 20,000 suspected noncitizen voters, and the Washington Times headline framed the request as DOJ pressing an appeals court to order California to discard ballots from suspected noncitizens. The Daily Signal published an exclusive headlined around what California did with the DOJ list and an election integrity group seeking records, and its available text did not include the state’s response.

Sources

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Written by AI from the reports listed below and nothing else. Loaded words are taken out, every claim is attributed to whoever made it, and each fact links to the outlets that report it. If something looks wrong, check the sources and tell us.

Outlets we read and analyze every day

53 outlets from the left, center and right. Logos belong to their publishers; we're not affiliated with them.

Every outlet, with ownership and lean →